[转帖]我看《杨振宁指〈易经〉阻碍科学启蒙》事件

杏林奇葩

下面引用由天魔道士在 2004/09/25 10:49am 发表的内容：
请问周易到底在科学上有什么突破？

I dare affirm , do not you know that " book of changes " is philosophy or the concrete science ?

杏林奇葩

下面引用由天魔道士在 2004/09/25 10:49am 发表的内容：
请问周易到底在科学上有什么突破？

Can you take concrete science to weigh philosophy?

杏林奇葩

The forming of the theoretical system of traditional Chinese medicine, have close contacts with China's ancient philosophy. Natural philosophy on " easy in week " especially that theory lay a foundation to make " Huang Ti pass " enormous influence to traditional Chinese medicine, have medicine exchange homology saying promptly from ancient times. " week the easy " to "in through " influence the in many aspects,choose negative and positive of , not become different this text only, when in location, the alike to count, to probe into the relation between the two. It lead negative and positive it come from " it is the easy in week ","in through "develop making at not medical; " in through "sport to becoming different, when location for hitting concept for absorption,make traditional Chinese medicine unable to different from national characters that Western medicine study of demonstrating

杏林奇葩

A scientific one is it need national great support and the educator's guide of environment to teach beginners, I do not think that there is obstruction like this that hinders the science of our country from teaching beginners in " book of changes "

杏林奇葩

The earliest binary scale calculates , it is overcast (--)(-) two yuan, is equivalent to 0 and 1 of present computer binary scale with male genital. Make up the Eight Diagrams by two of negative and positive, made up of the Eight Diagrams 64 divinatory symbol, continue and deduce, thousands upon thousands changes .

小乔

The " Yi Jing" can obstruct science enlightens, as really to like a thunderclap piercing the ear, there aren’t smelling. before.
Chinese science field should establish a new awards----“天磨豆豉” 奖！

亭斓

[这个贴子最后由亭斓在 2004/10/02 10:50pm 第 1 次编辑]

下面引用由天魔道士在 2004/09/24 10:04am 发表的内容：
转帖按：我也是反对易经的。
《我看《杨振宁指〈易经〉阻碍科学启蒙》事件》
by Fenng
今天看到这样一则新闻：《杨振宁指<易经>阻碍科学启蒙 众学者质疑》。详细
...要说杨老先生也有不对的地方，中国有多少人要靠
这《易经》吃饭呢，你这一说易经的不是，人家能不着急么？

你开口闭口说，对杨振宁评论《易经》有不同看法的人就是靠《易经》吃饭！不知你是靠什么吃饭的？按照你的逻辑，你是靠吹捧名人、吹捧权威、拍马屁吃饭的人！
你懂《易经》吗？请你先冷静下来，正确对待被评为世界文明三经之一的《易经》！如果《易经》可以供人吃饱饭，那你肚子饿的时候，不妨看一看！供你吃一口！

奔三

[这个贴子最后由奔三在 2004/10/04 04:33pm 第 3 次编辑]


The scientific doctyine was waiting the more and more war about virus

奔三

Only diseace , it mabey would holded orge of scientific doctrine to dispeare in place all more